Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 09:18
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Just in the last 5 years:
What are some things you do for your form of self-care?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
How to watch the 2025 Tony Awards - CNN
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
I test TVs for a living — and I recommend these 2 TVs above everything else - Tom's Guide
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
3 keys to success every Citadel intern learns their first week on the job - Business Insider
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
How likely is it to make a living out of being a window cleaner in a Nordic country?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Do you suck dicks with no reciprocation?
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What’s next?
CNN’s Live ‘Good Night, and Good Luck’ Telecast Spurs Special Coverage - Variety